Sorry, since no one else has replied, it’s me again… :-X
I’m back to the icon thing. Isn’t it possible that this two entry scan selection in the context menu a GOOD THING in that it is related to the file (program) icon associated with the software (executable or document file) ?
There is always an entry for the executable file, which is understandable.
The second entry is always an “ink” file (extent). This extent can be related to the CorelDRAW vector graphics software which is a legacy graphics file technology designed and supported by Microsoft.
I don’t know how icon (graphics) work with windows and are linked to their assocated software, but could this be a case where the icon is generally a seperate (graphics) file. Like in the case of my program I wrote in VB in which am using a seperate icon I found and added using windows which does show up with the second entry “ink” scan choice. But in cases where I have downloaded an intact executable maybe the icon is “built in” included within the software and not a seperate graphics designed file thus NO seperate entry “ink” file is listed in this case which is what I find on some files I have added to my Start>Programs list (which does not have the seperate entry).
To support my “theory” ;D ALL of the files that DO HAVE THE “INK” 2ND ENTRY IN THE CONTEXT MENU will OFFER ME A CHOICE TO SELECT AN ALTERNATE ICON IN THE PROPERTIES OPTION THEREFORE THE ICON IS A SEPERATE ENTITY AND AVAST SEES IT AS SUCH). BUT FOR THOSE FILES WHICH DO NOT HAVE THE 2ND ENTRY (“INK” FILE TYPE) THERE IS NO OPTION TO SELECT AN ALTERNATE ICON WHICH COULD BE DO TO THE FACT THAT THE ICON (IMAGE) IS INCORPORATED INTO THE EXECUTABLE THUS AVAST DOES NOT SEE IT (THE ICON) AS A SEPERATE GRAPHICS FILE AND THEREFORE A SECOND FILE SCAN OPTION IS NOT LISTED.
In conclusion in the cases where the icon can be changed and thus a seperate (attached) file as such Avast would see this as a seperate file which btw, could be infected with a virus I presume.
I’m just thinking out loud and have no idea of the technological aspects of what I am surmising, but I just thought I’d add my 2 cents with this idea just incase it makes any kind of sense.
This is my attempt at explaining why I have the 2 entries to can in the context menu on most but not all of my files and is consistent with how Windows is using the files in regards to the associated icon to the file itself.
So if my suggestion (idea) here is right Avast could be doing exactly what it should be doing and allowing the option to scan the seperate assocated icon.
Any opinions, thoughts, ideas ? ???