Thanks for this introduction, but how has that landscape changed with the coming of Android, also a linux based system (but not so much in the hands of the 5% secuity aware enthusiasts). Android now since January with 149 new malware families known. What are your explanations? 75% of the mobile linux malware is finacially motivated malware. Now that mobile linux is becoming a larger and larger platform target as it is used mainly in the hands of the unadvised. Yes, here the tables on linux security are now slowly turning,
Yes, very slowly. What can I see is “pure” Android and not Linux movements. The Android market means revenue. And does the Linux one also? I don’t think so…
There is no Linux viruses, it is not a Business, and Android, although based originally as a Linux-based operating system, once Google bought it, it changed very much from your General Linux GNU Operating Systems which run the largest Super Computers on the Planet, CERN, the world’s largest particle physics laboratory, and recently the International Space Station.
As of May 2013, a total of 900 million Android devices have been activated and 48 billion apps have been installed from the Google Play store.
I see relatively few similarities to the Linux Operating System I describe above. No checks and balances, just a huge 'free for all' in a huge open Market.
Please when you find a Linux Virus, PM me as I want it, and have many who would also love to see such a curiosity.
But yes polonus, it is Linux at it’s worst, with Google at the Helm, and so many Apps a Hacker’s Paradise.
"...You are not in the Windows world anymore and there are no Linux viruses in the wild, or otherwise.
All attempts to create a Linux virus as "proof of concept" have also failed, in that they required active participation from the root user to install, and even then, failed to propagate.
You may believe that as Linux gains popularity there will be viruses magically appearing, but you are wrong. There's a better chance that Santa Claus will drop down your chimney to give you presents, the Easter Bunny will drop off a basket of colored eggs, or the Tooth Fairy will pay for, and come collect your lost teeth, than you will get a Linux virus.
If you insist on installing AVG, use the RPM package they provide. Unless you plan to use it to scan email to be forwarded to Windows computers, you’ll find it a waste of time, effort, and resources."
Bitdefender Clueful is designed to warn Android users about apps that put their privacy at risk. Available free of charge, the app checks whether any of a user's installed programs are known to transmit smartphone numbers to advertising networks or cause push-message spam. Clueful establishes this by querying one of BitDefender's servers; it doesn't analyse the apps on the smartphone
The core component of Bitdefender’s database is the privileges that are requested by each app. The developers say that this information is complemented by a code analysis that can, for instance, flag up suspicious activities.
In a brief tests by The H and heise Security, the app did produce informative results. Clueful sorts apps according to three risk levels; most of the apps tested were put into the “Moderate Risk” category because they read the phone’s SMS text message inbox or its address book. In heise Security’s testing, three apps were placed in the “High Risk” category. According to Clueful, they create advertising links on the home screen, send the smartphone user’s email address to advertising networks and display spam in the notifications bar.
When a new app is installed, Clueful will automatically display a rating in the notifications bar. Those who frequently install new apps could soon find themselves wishing that warnings were only displayed when a new addition has a high-risk rating. Manually searching the database of Android apps is currently not an option.
Bitdefender released an iOS version of Clueful last year but had to remove it from the App Store; no reason was given for the removal, but it is believed that iOS apps are not allowed to examine other apps outside its own sandbox. Since the removal of the app, the database has been available for online queries.
But there also fantastic and wonderful things about linux like snort w Sourcefire VRT
and suricata with EmergingThreats IDS that should also come to Windows and would allow for quite an enrichment if easily portable.
See what urlquery dot net scans deliver here->: http://urlquery.net/report.php?id=2979900
Just installed DecafeinattID on Windows Vista with ARPCache Monitoring, all ideas ported from linux developers.
The security aware owe linux loads. On linux we see issues that never even appear on the Windows’ developing radar…
I use Avast4Linuxworkstations and have tried to keep the flame alive that one day Avast might upgrade what is essentially a 2005 Tool for keeping Windows users who come in contact via Email with Linux users, from becoming infected.
The Virus Data Base is current, that’s essentially what an on demand AV scanner is.
What excuse do people who don’t even use Linux have for even saying anything here at all ?
All I hear is negativity. An Avast tool to keep less Malware off the Web, I feel it’s a wonderful idea.
Positivity boys and girls, the intention is simple courtesy.
An Avast4Linux update will come soon enough, other than that there aint a lot to natter about.
It makes more than yours and is far less off topic. Spaghetti IS pasta, Android is not Linux even if it did branch off from it. It’s become different enough to be a different animal. Like Firefox is not Netscape and I am not my Grandfather.
Android has evolved to the point where it’s a better OS than Linux.
‘There are no viruses for Linux’ is (to my limited knowledge) a true statement.
However (again, to my limited knowledge) it is not the same as ‘bad things associated with malware don’t happen under Linux’.
Browser hijacks happen, as a quick search on the ubuntu forum will reveal. They always seem very easy to remedy under Linux, but if you don’t happen to know how they will still spoil your day.
Cross platform malware (java/flash exploits) are presumably relevant (at least that’s how I read it), though presumably more limited in scope.
If you’re really ill-advised or incautious I gather you can even let yourself be persuaded to install a trojan such as BackDoor.Wirenet.1 and have all your passwords stolen.
So I think there can be other reasons for an anti-malware scan of a linux OS (Home folder at least) than Old-Polacks suggested ‘email to be forwarded to Windows computers’.
Ill-advised and incautious people exist, and some no doubt use Linux.
Android has not grown out of Linux- it is based on the Linux kernel. It is as much Linux as spaghetti is pasta.
So are fusilli, tagliatelle, lasagne and linguine.
How can you say you don’t like pasta without defining which types of pasta?
Or, to drop the metaphor, what incarnation of Linux do you hate? Linux on your set top TV box, Linux on your printer, Linux in your router, or Linux on the server serving up this page?