Did I not note that I reported everything to Avast in the first post? And waited a while? And found that Avast acted on the reports in the expected way?

It’s my observation that the comprehension of my original post has not been particularly high in this thread.

I’m not asking for the ability to immediately ignore Avast’s detection - in the contrary I’m asking that Avast offer the ability to time-out an EXCLUSION so that it will not remain in force forever.

What part of that seems at odds with “the exclusion usually happens by the next update”?

Do you folks honestly think it’s better to allow an exclusion to remain in force forever?

Thank you for your responses. But please, save your arguments for people posting things you’re actually AGAINST.

-Noel