Surely you have enough information in the article to make up your own mind !
Given that AVG (AKA Avast) are one of those listed.
Only 23 apps had a 100 percent success rate with all malware samples. A few more were over 99 percent effective. Most of the big names in malware research and protection were near the top including AVG, ESET, Kaspersky, McAfee, and Sophos.
So where is this claim Avast mobile is worthless (a word search on that page doesn’t even find avast) ?
Or are they guilty by omission ?
Nonsense. The webshield alone in AMS makes having the app worthwhile. I’m alerted 1-2 times per month for URL:Mal or URL:Blacklist for links I’ve clicked. For another 75+/- opinions, I also have the VirusTotal mobile app. It has never found anything that AMS hasn’t already found.
Well if you ask for a response (the title asks for one) you are going to get one.
Basically I don’t think they are all useless, so if you are going to blindly believe all are useless even those with 100% and the others with 99% and not offer your thoughts it is going to be somewhat one sided.
It is certainly a more detailed review. Though this tends to be the antivirus programs from the major players (smaller sample), they are most likely to have been in the 100% & 99% of the previous check in this topic.
“For the most part, yeah.” Because, unless you regularly engage in risky behavior you’ll probably never need antivirus on mobile. Phones are more limited, and more secure, than PCs. Android has built in antivirus unless you turn it off. I have AV programs installed only because I like to reverse engineer malware, and often sideload apps for the same reason. For a normal person, 99% of the time, AV is just wasted memory on your phone