IM protection:instant messages protection
P2P:peer to peer networks protection
HIPS:host instruction prevention
IDS: instruction detection system
anti-phishing in avast:when you try to surf a phishing website or infected one avast will warn you
avast 4.8! home edition/Norton 2010/avira free9/avg free 8.5/kaspersky antivirus 2010/eset nod 4/dr.web 5
the gray ball mean i dont know about you if you know let us know.
i am not a media designer and avast forum dont allow huge files so i try to make it so small with good quality.
if any thing wrong please correct it and add to it then share it with other websites to let people know about the real antivirus.
With an image like this, with few colours it is easier to save it as a gif, that would reduce the file size considerably without any real loss of quality.
The same image I copied and saved as a gif works out at 61.7KB, a third of the size.
I tend to use only gif images when posting.
avast with HIPS? Where did you get that picture?
Norton without P2P protection? ???
Hi superhacker,something indeed is wrong with your chart
1.Avast 4.8 don’t have the behavior shield.Avast 5 has that
2.Avg free does have anti-phishing.The active web shield that is installed with the link scanner does that.
Some other things you need to correct:
HIPS mean host intrusion prevention system and not host instruction system
IDS means intrusion detection system and not instruction detection system
Hope this helps you
i mean beahvior blocker OR HIPS
NORTON WITHOUT P2P THAT WHAT THEY SAY
HIPS mean host intrusion prevention system and not host instruction system IDS means intrusion detection system and not instruction detection systemI AM NOT A NATIVE ENGLISH SPEAKER YOU SHOULD BLAME GOOGLE CHROME IT TELL ME TO CHANGE IT
I AM NOT A NATIVE ENGLISH SPEAKER YOU SHOULD BLAME GOOGLE CHROME IT TELL ME TO CHANGE IT
host intrusion prevention system
intrusion detection system
Weird. I am using Google Chrome 4.0.206.1 and I did not have any trouble with spell check.
Avira has anti phishing also.
So does Firefox, so does OpenDNS, so for me this isn’t an essential must have feature, but just another tick in a box.
The chart is biased imho.
Avira has anti phishing alsoavira website tell you free avira dont have one.
The chart is biased imhoalwil team are not my cousins and other vendors are not my enemies and i dont work for avast so ... and please before talking like this tell the wrong :-\ و السلام عليكم try to understand it it will be hard why because you are not a native Arabic speaker. thanks
superhacker, can you post here where did you get that chart?
yep
avast home from:http://www.avast.com/eng/avast-free-home-antivirus-antispyware.html
norton anti virus:www.symantec.com/ then browse to the products and…
avira:http://www.free-av.com/en/pages/6/comparative_chart.html
kaspersky,dr.web,avg free nod32 from their web site
and i post that gray ball mean i dont find answer
Hi superhacker,
Iḿ not sure if my googling is luckier than your googling; how about ¨peace¨ and there is no need to be upset because DavidR, an acknowledged authority, says ¨ïtś only a matter of ticking boxes¨.
My regards
Oh, you’ve created the chart!? :
Well, maybe biased was not the correct word.
But seems that you need to double check if you have made the correct assumptions, doesn’t you?
My comment was directed to the post directly above mine. The point of it was more of a there are now getting to be so many features that get added to AVs which are already covered by many other applications. Some of which I would say aren’t directly an anti-virus function, but because someone introduces it they all end up adding it just to have that box ticked (so to speak).
So when there is some form of comparison they don’t want to be with an empty box, making them look lacking in any way, so they too add the feature and so checking the box.
Hi DavidR,
I acknowledged your expertise. However, if you read the context of your own words carefully; then on balance your implication is that anti phishing is unimportant whereas it seems to me that it is frequently of vital importance.
My regards
Not that it is unimportant, but the fact does it really needs to be in an AV, as there are so many browsers and other applications that have it incorporated already, not to mention if you use OpenDNS as your DNS server then that too can be incorporated.
So there are more than you can shake a stick at, the problem being AV A decides to add it to get a jump on AV B, C & D, etc. Now they feel they have to tick the boxes and include it too, when the first point of contact on a phishing site would be your DNS server and after that the next physical point of contact would be your browser. So there is a hell of a lot of redundancy.
If they use openDNS, if they use Firefox, if…if…if…but if they do not are you saying AV A has never protected any customer(s) from this real threat?
My regards
avira dont have anti phishing:there is no modules scan web contenent in real time.i have this information from:
و السلام عليكم try to understand it it will be hard why because you are not a native Arabic speaker. thanks
و السلام عليكم = Bye.
Are you the one who made the chart or was it from an Arabic site that you are telling us that we wont understand?