Why do you use AVG for email Technical ? I think the email protection of Avast is far superior (good heuristics) and one of its best features.
I have the same question. In my opinion, all it accomplishes is to slow down accessing your e-mail because it now has to be scanned twice. Also, there are more resources being used. ???
Why do you use AVG for email Technical ? I think the email protection of Avast is far superior (good heuristics) and one of its best features.
You’re right. I’ll publish the results.
But, if you practice safe browsing, 99% of the virus will come by email. Why do not worry with the majority cause?
I have the same question. In my opinion, all it accomplishes is to slow down accessing your e-mail because it now has to be scanned twice. Also, there are more resources being used. ???
Resources used are minimal. Not relevant. Time of downloading slows down in miliseconds. C’mon, the security could worth it. Well, I think I’m alone here :
I see what you mean now Technical.
You use both, I thought you meant you didn’t use Avast for email scanning.
:-\ erm, sorry, my brains beginning to hurt. What’s the difference then between AVG & avast! ?
I’m not that keen on AVG but I do rate Antivir and avast! and would rather use that combination. I know they’re different products but If AVG will run happily alongside Antivir, why won’t avast! ?
I know they’re different products but If AVG will run happily alongside Antivir, why won’t avast! ?
I think I answered your question in other thread… ???
AntiVir (free) does not have an email provider and the on-access could be disabled.
It will work with avast.
AVG, without the resident, will work with avast too.