if avast secure browser includes the anti fingerprint function and it is completely free why should I pay for the above software to have the same function?
is it possible that there is no answer? what is the difference between the two?
Hi,
Avast Anti-Track Premium has more features than only Anti-Fingerprint.
It can also be used on with other Browsers.
Please see the FAQ (Features) for more information: https://support.avast.com/en-ww/article/AntiTrack-FAQ
Thanks for the reply.
I have tested the trial version. The main function is anti fingerprint. Then there are shortcuts for system settings and to eliminate browser cookies, but nothing that cannot be done even without it.
By the way I tested it with “https://panopticlick.eff.org/” and the browser still seems to have a unique fingerprint.
So if I only use avast secure browser I don’t need avast antitrack premium?
Hi, could you please provide us with the following information so that we can look into.
The version of AntiTrack, the browser you used, settings in AntiTrack (screenshots) and if AntiTrack extension was installed. Thank you
Hi,
Avast AntiTrack Premium is more than just digital fingerprint changer. It helps you clear trackers and stops targeted ads while you are browsing the internet and helps you secure your privacy. With Avast AntiTrack Premium you have options to manage the cookie clearing and set everything according to your needs while Anti-fingerprinting in SecureBrowser allows only on and off mode. The ultimate decision on what you need is yours.
avast secure browser is also capable of doing all these things. Or am I wrong?
Windows 10 pro 64bit last stable version
Chrome 64 bit last stable version + extension
Avast antitrack premium last version / trial 30days - score: 100%