Thank you for coming up with the VT scan results that show that avast missed detection. Did you forward to virus AT avast dot com also, so they can add this to detection?
Thanks for that important observation, and this is something to reckon with both for us here that check on/follow avast’s overall detection results and also for the avast tean members’ making that VT is getting the updated avast detection results right! I think this makes VT scanning a bit more obscure, but I hope that isn’t the case. Good the guys at VT took the MD5 hash out, because it is no longer secure anymore. We have to use the longer SHA256 hash now to land at the VT file scan results following a particular URL scan. I hope Pondus, Asyn, Dim@rik, razoresq and the others out of VT regurly also are fully aware these changes with VT scanning handling. Anyway thanks for the heads up!
