Very low false positives rate and surprisingly high detection rate for signature only antivirus (if we compare it to others that do have heuristics). ALWIL team proved themself yet again.
Btw, i think it would be smart to add all the ADVANCED awards on your webpage. AV-Comparatives test is already pretty well known and respected. Some AV vendors are already using their awards to promote their product capabilities. I think ALWIL should do it too as streak ADVANCED awards aren’t something to be forgotten or to chit chat about it just in AV geek circles…
Especially when you look at percentage. 37% for signature only antivirus is really not bad. Other competitors all have heuristics, yet they don’t score much better or they have awful false positives problems.
I don’t quite understand how they come up with their certification level. For instance, AntiVir PE detected 81% and received only standard. Avast detected 37% and received Advanced. How does this make sense?
Other than the Script Blocker in Avast Pro making a difference, shouldn’t Avast Home be very close to the Pro versions results for both of the AV Comparitive Tests? I of course will add how impressive the latest test for Avast was, and not to be snide. But it did better than AVG Anti-Malware which has Heuristics and uses the Ewido engine for help. Also I have used AVG AM and it runs higher in memory than Avast Home.
grats to alwil team which proves for once again that avast is competitive and can reach kaspersky and eset and even become better than them ;D alwil keep up the gd work…and its indeed a gd idea to post the results in the webpage…it would be a nice way to advertise avast as u show y they should trust it…