I check the file on google and the file belongs to superantispyware; a legitimate company. I uploaded the file to http://virustotal.com and http://virusscan.jotti.org and it did not find anything wrong with the file. Is it a false positive with avast heuristics?
Simple answer, yes, it’s a false positive.
Less simple, heuristic detection (by any program) is more likely to report a legitimate file as being a possible threat, because of the expected or projected behaviour of that file. (Don’t ask me how Avast makes this determination.)
This especially seems to be true of security software, I think because good security software has the ability to access parts of the file system not usually accessible.
Superantispyware has a feature called “DDA”, for Direct Disk Access.
I suspect the driver for this is what’s being flagged.
So, if this file belonged to something else, the suspicious behaviour would definitely be a cause for further investigation.
NOt really a “False Positive”, more a genuine and valid detection, that in this case proves harmless.
Whilst this is a valid file, I have SAS Pro installed and a) this services isn’t running, b) there is no detection by the avast anti-rootkit scan, obvious I guess since it isn’t running.
Now I don’t know what version of SAS you have free/pro or why this might be running on your system but not mine ?
It may be that your SAS update happened to coincide with the avast anti-rootkit scan 8 minutes after boot (or why it would be a hidden service) ?
I have just initiated an SAS update and is progressing, but a) no detection by avast and no sasdifsv.sys running.