http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yRNJXT9FilE&hd=1
Should I be worried?
Many other posts on that YouTube tester! :
I’m not worried. 8)
No, I prefer to get my information from independent, reputable organisations with clear testing processes/methodology which are fully documented. Or from my own personal experience of avast over almost seven years that I have been using it, than from an armchair youtube tester.
This guy doesn’t even know what he’s doing and how to do this.
Ah, the YouTube guy. Completely broken testing methodology. How do we even know his “samples” (bunch of random links) contain malicious code that should be detected? :
Is any out there? :
You could split hairs all day on “who are you really going to trust?”, the only real answer is “your own experience”
If you think “languy” is more trustworthy and has better methods than something like AV Comparatives though…well, everyone gets to have an opinion.
Those tests are hardly what i call fair, due to the minuscule sample set and the fact that the files are so new there’s little chance that any vendor will have signatures for them yet. At best, its a heuristics test… heuristics=guessing by the way