Avast! vs Eset

[system]

IMP: Avast 6 vs ESET 2011
avast uses less CPU usage than eset
but detection rate is more of eset
referred from avast forums and community like vb 100 and virus total
as both of av are nice but nothing is the best
if not updated avast it gives more false positives than eset and if not updated eset d detection rate is less so for those
who do not have a net connection i prefer avast 6 + mbam or avast + sas or avast + threat fire.
thanks for ur support.

[CraigB]

@KBC post:21

IMP: Avast 6 vs ESET 2011
avast uses less CPU usage than eset
but detection rate is more of eset
referred from avast forums and community like vb 100 and virus total
as both of av are nice but nothing is the best
if not updated avast it gives more false positives than eset and if not updated eset d detection rate is less so for those
who do not have a net connection i prefer avast 6 + mbam or avast + sas or avast + threat fire.
thanks for ur support.

Another user who cant read post dates : this thread is about as outdated as the threatfire you mentioned.

[system]

I don’t much about ESET 2011 or Nod32.

What I do know is the ESET AV on-line scanner

1. can be used along with avast!
2. will work with W8-DP.
3. is very slow.
4. has occasionally caught some stuff that AIS has allowed in and missed. However, in my experience that has been rare.

[system]

Another user who cant read post dates Roll Eyes

Yeap.

this thread is about as outdated as the threatfire you mentioned.

Yeap again.