well, I could always install Panda cloud…I did once, no system conflict occurred, but it’s still like having a second resident AV, which could lead to problems if **** happened, like both Avast and Panda would attempt to block the same infection at the same time and could neutralize each other.
I guess the solution you’re referring to would be to install CIS5 with no AV, as the cloud component can still be called if necessary by Def+
Well just looking at the VT results avast isn’t alone in not detecting it and it is in some pretty good company in detection ratings. Not to mention the greatest majority of those detections are generic.
However, the sample uploaded to VT being a \patch\keyge…, which in itself is suspect/higher risk of infection.
C’mon… Will you give avast credit for a missdetection?
Yes. CIS5 without the antivirus. Free sandbox, cloud scanning and HIPS.
If I remember correctly, Panda cloud conflicts with avast (at least, latest versions).
I know that… That’s why I leave the name of the file… But it does not change the fact that avast miss it.
By the way, already submitted by Chest. Hope they improve detection.
I’ve got that keygen deliberately downloading P2P cracked software.
Of course, I did not install neither the software nor used the keygen.
By the way, this thread was about cloud scanning and avast ;D
heh, not only kids… recently saw one adult downloading and cracking(with keygens) lots of software(pretty crappy one, too - stuff from iobit for example)
+1
I just wanted to mention that such threats as the one related in this thread are very likely to be encountered by thousands of people. My goal was certainly not to discuss keygens here.
By the way, does anybody knows how to download other samples missed by avast to test the CIS cloud scanning?
Of course, do not post live links to malware, or, better, send me an IM.