I was just reading up on how CNet’s Download.com was wrapping all of the downloads in their own installer, which in turn was then installing spyware on client’s computers:
As I was checking out some of the downloads mentioned in the article I noticed that Avast was listed as the second most popular download on the site. I went to the Avast page there and checked, and sure enough the downloaded file was named “setup_av_free_cnet.exe”, so obviously something has been added to the installer. I am on a Linux box and was unable to run the executable under wine (it errored out trying to open the self-extracting archive), so I don’t know exactly what the installation screen looked like in this instance. I am curious though, are the authors of Avast aware of this custom bundling and the issues with CNet distributing spyware? If so, what is their opinion on it?
The avast! download was always clean.
I’ve only gotten their downloader once when I wasn’t signed in on their Site.
Since I’m a member of their forum and while I’m logged on,
I’ve never gotten anything except the actual download I requested.
There is no way I would sign up to a forum and be logged on just to avoid their cr*p. I would just rather avoid cnet.
Whilst avast isn’t meant to be in their wrapper, that policy at cnet could change. This is what has always concerned me when the user starts to blame avast for the associated cr*pware additions.