Thanks, YoKenny. I decided to take the easier route and download the Ani-Malware you suggested, it found 19 threats, and I had it removed 'em all. I hope this fixed things. (Btw, how often do you suggest I run this malware program for future reference?)
to answer your question…if you intend to use malwarebytes as a on demand scanner(free version, like you just did) as alot of people do, once a week is fine, just be sure to do a update before scanning.
I’m on dial-up and the MBAM updates are a pain in the rear as it download the complete database again and that is why I only do a weekly scan and update prior to that scan. That is one of the reasons why I wouldn’t buy it as I wouldn’t be using the resident protection, allowing auto updating of the database.
Thanks guys, you have been really helpful. I may purchase it, but I think I’ll stick with the free version for now. I was actually debating on renewing my norton again for further protection, but if you all feel having avast and the MBAM program should protect me enough, I’ll take your word for it. ;D Thanks again!
I know I’m not forced to do anything, but I simply won’t support them if they can’t implement an incremental update, rather than download the full database every time. Perhaps I’m spoilt with avasts incremental update process, if MBAM could implement something similar then it would be so much of a chore updating taking 15-20 minutes.
They have talked about it for long enough, surely it can’t be beyond their collective wit, it has to be to their benefit too as they wouldn’t be using anywhere near the same bandwidth, which presumably they have to pay for.
I’m not having any problems with SpywareBlaster updating. As the MalwareBytes forum thread states, this is affecting those people that, because of their geographic areas and the CDN loading, are routed to the blacklisted distributed IPs. This shouldn’t happen.