this problem very probably occurs to the customers, which manually updated to version 268. There was one additional 268 update. This bug shouldn’t affect the users of other versions.
The bug in the setup lies in inability to delete broken package and trying again to do the wrong diff.
untested one (looking for brave young man to test it)
Delete files setup_av_pro_10c.vpu & setif_av_pro_10c.vpu from avast4\setup directory and rerun program update manually.
We apologize for the inconvenience, the setup/update program is after serious rewrite and is still buggy (at least I hope that 278 is much, much better).
Just wanted to say I had this problem again with version 278. I was about to install another virusscanner until I read your message. I tried method#2, and only found one of those files in my directory (can’t remember which one it was though), and deleted it. That fixed the problem, now it updates without saying the program is broken.
Unfortunately, updating from 268 to 278 has caused some problems. It varies from OS to OS and in the manner of update.
My XP machine updated automatically to 278 without a hitch, but my W98 did not seem to even try to update.
I did a manual update and received the “broken packet” error.
I did NOT manually update my older version to 268 so I do not hold to the theory that the problem is caused by manually updating to 268.
I did examine the content of the Avast Setup folder and noticed as Kubey stated in his comments…that there are 2 setup files 10c and 116.
Instead of deleting 10c, I just renamed it and tried the update again. THIS WAS SUCCESSFUL.
I noticed that the most of the dll files were overwritten and the setup file 116 updated.
Apparently, there is a confusion to AVAST when it attempts to utilize setup10c and setup116.
I would recommend that 10c be deleted or renamed first.
This is simpler to do, and seems to be a proper fix. I will not be able to tell if this works long term until my AVAST autoupdates.
Thanks, Techie for your hard work and post (maybe it´ll be usefull for a lot of users, including mantra that is finding troubles under W98).
Btw, anything happens with new 4.1.280 ? 8)
Techie answers in my place. See his post ;D
I was asking him if he had experience any trouble… :-
Let´s be happy users, everything is working now with 4.1.280 ;D