polonus - I did have a question if you happen to venture back here. You said quote:
Now sometimes with a clean site we have to allow some additional functionality to make that site function. At urlquery net for instance you have to allow google-analytics.com else you will not get the scan results.
As I see it this could be problematic because from what I understand about the FF “NoScript” if you “allow” something like “google-analytics” then it is “allowed” for all sites that might have “google-analytics”. So while I understand the need to get a site to work but then in doing so is it opening the door for problems with other sites?
I’ve not allowed “google-analytics” so I’ve obviously not had the need by using “urlquery net”, thus “google-analytics” remains not allowed when browsing.
On that point, I’m not certain how the “lock” used in Umatrix works. Umatrix says it’s saving all temporary changes for this “scope”, so perhaps that means (“scope”) that specific website. If that’s the case then that’s a good thing, but as I understand it with “NoScript” allowing applies to all sites or am I wrong there?
Also you’ve mentioned quote:
Red ball from Bitdefender, don’t even try to go there
… what exactly is that about?
One last point, in ABP wouldn’t unchecking “All some non-intrusive advertising” then eliminate “google-analytics”.
It’s really a shame how Google is infiltrating themselves into everything leaving users with increasingly less alternatives all the time. A big reason I prefer to not use Chrome personally and stick with FF as my primary browser. Unfortunately I’ve been noticing the FF user base is continuing to dwindle at the expense of the every growing Chrome. Unfortunately people either don’t care or just don’t pay attention. That’s the problem we have in politics as well in regards to the “low information” type people. Speaking of “off topic”, now I’m REALLY “off topic”, so I’ll end it here. 
