My site, www.lolabou.org , was infected some monts ago, the problem was solved long ago, but avast is still blocking my site. I am so worried because it is my professional site! What can I do to fix it? Thanks a lot
Maybe you should do more about it. I don’t know why it got 1 mark for Trustworthiness, Vendor reliability and Privacy in WOT(a plug-in for Firefox and Chrome). You know, the marks are given by its users. And I think people(like me, who trust WOT) will keep off it when seeing the red loop on the page and the warning popped out.
You can not completely take WOT at face value. I have seen enough evidence here and elsewhere to know that WOT bad ratings can be easy to acquire, and near impossible to get rid of.
I still use WOT, despite this. A red or yellow mark will make me hesitate, but if I am interested in the site, I will cross-reference it with other ratings from Norton SafeWeb, Browser Defender, etc.
Report 2010-06-28 22:25:40 (GMT 1)
Website lolabou.org
Domain Hash 2981e4c9337ff03dea0e98276abfc4a6
IP Address 82.98.134.15 [SCAN]
IP Hostname hl61.dinaserver.com
IP Country ES (Spain)
AS Number 42612
AS Name DINAHOSTING-AS ASN de Dinahosting SL
Detections 1 / 19 (5 %)
Status SUSPICIOUS
Scanning site with: AMaDa CLEAN
Scanning site with: BrowserDefender CLEAN
Scanning site with: Finjan CLEAN
Scanning site with: Google Diagnostic CLEAN
Scanning site with: hpHosts CLEAN
Scanning site with: Malware Patrol CLEAN
Scanning site with: MalwareDomainList CLEAN
Scanning site with: McAfee SiteAdvisor CLEAN
Scanning site with: McAfee TrustedSource CLEAN
Scanning site with: MyWOT DETECTED
Scanning site with: Norton SafeWeb CLEAN
Scanning site with: ParetoLogic URL Clearing House CLEAN
Scanning site with: PhishTank CLEAN
Scanning site with: SURBL CLEAN
Scanning site with: Threat Log CLEAN
Scanning site with: TrendMicro Web Reputation CLEAN
Scanning site with: URIBL CLEAN
Scanning site with: Web Security Guard UNRATED
Scanning site with: ZeuS Tracker CLEAN
Well, Norton tells us whether the website is infected with viruses, and WOT tell us whether our privacy (just an example) is prone to be stolen. Anything could only be a reference, since AVs got false positives, WOT got its ratings by its users. Isn’t it?
PS:ogran, we’re and are only talking about WOT and its reliability… Of course I don’t think your website will endeavour to steal sth. from its users…
Scanned through finjan’s URL checker: The requested URL was analyzed and found legitimate
Unmasked parasites: not currently listed as suspicious
But should get off of these blacklists:
But let us be aware of eventual exploits, for the site has ShockwaveFlash.ShockwaveFlash.7
as you so gently demonstrated in your Wepawet exploration…
I always give wepawet and jsunpack links as htxp or wxw links, because
(malcreants are reading these forums too, you know, and their “well-willing” intentions may differ ;D)
htxp://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/11182/