I just installed Winpatrol Plus yesterday, after getting familiar with the free version for 24hrs. It is a great little program to say the least. It is under 2MB’s for both disc space and resource usage. It found both a Panda Cloud, and a Comodo Active X item, and they both were active. They were the only other two AVs that have ever been on my machine, so I guess the unistaller for each needs a little more work. WP easily deleted both items. I have it set to monitor in real time, and it is totally invisible to my machine in terms of any types of slowdowns. Very cool.
Now to those of you who run WP, my question is, did you guys exclude WP in any of avast!'s shields? If so, which ones? I have not excluded WP at all, and it is running smoothly and using only 1,300kb in task manager as I have it set.
Any advice from experienced WP / avast! users would be appreciated.
The only issue was with a stubborn startup registry entry that wouldn’t delete. I had to use another program.
(I think that this was because WP runs under the user account, so may not have privileges to remove it permanently. Maybe if I was logged in as admin it may have removed it…)
I like WP, just little things like knowing in advance that flash will update because of the startup entry
Yea, I was a little reluctant at first to try it, but curiosity got the better of me. I have yet to pay for the Pro/Plus version of any paid program (sorry avast! ;D ) but the free version was so cool, that I pulled the trigger on the paid upgrade. Thanks for the feedback!
It runs invisibly here on my W7 x64 Home Premium machine. I have real time monitoring on (Plus/paid feature) and as I type this WP is using 1,477k of ram and I don’t even know its there.
I’d like to tag a question onto this thread if I may.
Avast (like most/all other AVs) seems to have problems detecting some fake AVs.
I used to run a HIPS (Comodo FW/D+) to protect against this (or at least alert to it).
Now I have upgraded to AIS and uninstalled D+, can I expect Winpatrol Plus to do the same(by alerting to new start menu entries or services placed by any fake AV, or do these fakes have methods that are too subtle)?
(I know this isn’t the right section, or even the right forum really, but the since the thread was here I thought I’d give it a try).
D+ is a HIPS. ThreatFire is a behavior blocker. Different technologies. Apples and oranges.
One blocks/informs everything. Other uses rules/signatures to analyze behavior and block some of them (suspicious).
They shouldn’t. But, in fact, TF is not being accelerated developed anymore. In the past it has “conflicts” with a lot of things. For me, messes more than protects.
Don’t forget to disable Comodo Sandbox IF you’re going to using Avast Sandbox otherwise this will cause problems if you have both running at the same time