I do not. I could understand if it was a new virus, but the TRZ virus has been around for years. I don’t need to be lectured like a fool, just as if I’m not fully aware that new malware comes out regularly, programed by geeks who have nothing better to do than cause problems for others. But when we’re talking about a virus that’s been around as long as this one, I have to wonder why an anti virus company that touts itself as one of the best of the best failed to detect and prevent it, and then couldn’t fully get rid of it without having to go through a whole rigmarole to do it. I’m sorry, but if Pondus represents Avast, then I’m seeing excuses, but not an acknowledgement that the antivirus program did fail and that work still needs to be done to correct the problem.

In any case, whether all the files were removed or not, the procedure I used has gotten rid of the effect of those files. To me, that’s the important thing. As long as there is no longer any harm being caused to my computer, I don’t care whether some “crap files,” as Pondus puts it, are still on my computer. If you have a computer and use the Internet, then you’re going to get junk files and “crap files.” Most of the time they take up an insignificant amount of space and cause no harm. There are plenty of methods of cleaning them out every so often.

I see absolutely no reason at all to run multiple programs, followed by sending in log files, and waiting for experts to tell me what to delete. If Pondus wants to do that, it’s his choice. My choice is not to spend time worrying about a problem that no longer exists. As I said, if I have any further problems with this virus or it somehow resurrects itself and causes me problems, that’s when I’ll do my worrying. Until then, as far as I’m concerned, problem solved.