Help needed understanding reports about potentially malicious site

What I’ve gathered from the NoScript forum is that if presented in an Iframe, NoScript wouldn’t prevent .js-files from being downloaded to the cache, but it would prevent the scripts from being executed. I hope my understanding is correct.

Anyway, if the experts don’t think there is anymore to this even with my attempts at explaining my fears, I guess it can be considered resolved/closed until something more serious happens. My thanks to Asyn, DavidR and polonus for putting up with me.

You’re welcome.

Hi Paradoxian,

You are welcome. Additional info as I scanned the site again unconventionally and it returned:

cookie_callback(‘470015ac204d50fb10cc61c7’)
; protocol handler calls back to the CookieHander object, if set, to handle the state management…no exploits found…

polonus

So I wasn’t wrong that cookies left by the first visit made the site look different the other visits? Well, as long as I’m still safe.

Feels a bit anti-climactic to write another post. Sorry, I’ll go away now!