heuristic analysis

hello all … i have a question … why dont avast home and pro dont have heuristic engine ?? even the avira free edition have the heuristics … its very important to have a heuristics engine … i hope to add it in the coming versions …

heuristics:

Heuristic analysis is a method employed by many computer antivirus programs designed to detect previously unknown computer viruses, as well as new variants of viruses already in the wild.

Heuristic analysis is an expert based analysis that determines the susceptibility of a system towards particular threat/risk using various decision rules or weighing methods. MultiCriteria analysis (MCA) is one of the means of weighing. This method differs with statistical analysis, which bases itself on the available data/statistics.

How it works

Most antivirus programs that utilize heuristic analysis perform this function by executing the programming commands of a questionable program or script within a specialized virtual machine, thereby allowing the anti-virus program to internally simulate what would happen if the suspicious file were to be executed while keeping the suspicious code isolated from the real-world machine. It then analyzes the commands as they are performed, monitoring for common viral activities such as replication, file overwrites, and attempts to hide the existence of the suspicious file. If one or more virus-like actions are detected, the suspicious file is flagged as a potential virus, and the user alerted.

Another common method of heuristic analysis is for the anti-virus program to decompile the suspicious program, then analyze the source code contained within. The source code of the suspicious file is compared to the source code of known viruses and virus-like activities. If a certain percentage of the source code matches with the code of known viruses or virus-like activities, the file is flagged, and the user alerted.

Effectiveness

Although heuristic analysis is capable of detecting many previously-unknown viruses and new variants of current viruses, the effectiveness is fairly low regarding accuracy and the number of false positives. This is because computer viruses, just like biological viruses, are constantly changing and evolving. Since heuristic analysis mostly operates on the basis of past experience (by comparing the suspicious file to the code and functions of known viruses), it is likely to miss new viruses that contain previously unknown code or methods of operation not found in any known viruses. Fortunately, heuristic analysis is also evolving along with the viruses. As new viruses are discovered using alternative methods of detection, information about them are added to the heuristic analysis engine, thereby providing it the means to detect any new viruses based on the previously-unknown code.

http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=236281

Especially pay attention to post number 4.

Well, your “How it works” part is mostly wrong. Heuristics is usually done in a different (and much simpler) way than emulation. And decompilation?? Sorry, but it’s just nonsense.

The effectiveness of “heuristics” (whatever you call with that name, which is usually something different for each product) is rather questionable; so you can’t say that avast! has worse detection without “heuristics” than other products with it.

As-Salaamu Alikum Wa Ramatuallah Wa Barakatu
Hurestics is a a term that really has little meaning.
Check boxes are one thing,detection are another,an Avast!'s
Detection is with the best of them,without the quirkieness of some.
Innal Haqq.
Noor

i didnt saied that avast sux , iam a user of avast and if i dunt like it i woulnt post here … … i know that avast have a good self defence , but even heuristics is so important …

well its not my info i took it from wikipidia…i know avast detections are very good iam an user of it … thanx for posting