It got to the point where Matousec, which I hadn’t heard of until it was mentioned in that thread, brought me to the avast! forums.
Those guys hold up that Matousec test like a golden specter.
Thank you for educating me on just how ridiculous Matousec is.
I have been using avast! on my Android so I decided to install the latest version on my Windows 7 64-bit SP1 PC. I had ran a full scan earlier with CIS and it found no problems. After installing avast!, I ran a full scan while I was away from home. When I returned, it had found 6 malware items (attached photo).
I have been using avast! on my Android so I decided to install the latest version on my Windows 7 64-bit SP1 PC. I had ran a full scan earlier with CIS and it found no problems. After installing avast!, I ran a full scan while I was away from home. When I returned, it had found 6 malware items (attached photo).
They instead get all pissy when Matousec is criticized and questions of security and detection are raised. I think somewhere in that thread it was mentioned CIS isn’t even designed to remove malware but rather to prevent it. Prevention is great, but detection and removal are also important if something gets through IMO.
The whole point of that entire thread was why CIS didn’t test well in the…