intiate database update through the command line ?

DavidR and Nesivos
I’m using 4.8 Home Edition. As I mentioned earlier, there is a program in the Avast directory
called ashupd.exe. If you execute it with the “vps” switch, it will update the database,
very similar looking as when you right click the icon and update the database.

There is another switch, /silent, that will do the business without further ado:
No voice or visual feed back.

There is a task scheduler in the control panel of Windows 2000. I’ve never used it before
but it’s perfect for this. It uses a GUI, helps you to set it up. You can pick a time and frequency,
identify the user it runs under, etc,etc. It’s the perfect solution to the problem.

Having said that, I may still give 5x a try. If it doesn’t work properly, I can always revert back.

If it doesn't work properly, I can always revert back.

For a little while longer anyway.

I hear what you’re saying - I took the plunge and installed 5 on my XP box.
I like the look of it so far. I noticed the behavior shield.
I’ve got the xp “WIndows Defender” active - that monitors certain areas of
the system and alerts you to “deny” or “permit” certain actions.

Should I disable XP WD, assuming they have duplicate functionality ?
I see posts in the internet stating that Avast 5x doesn’t disable Windoww Defender -
hxxp://www.brighthub.com/computing/smb-security/articles/63727.aspx

but I was wondering if a “best practice” had determined for the two products.
TIA for any info.

davexnet I wonder why you do not update your PROFILE as even DavidR avast! Technical advisor does. :wink:

Windows Defender is un-necessary on Windows XP.

Please go to PROFILE then Modify Profile then Forum Profile Information then update your Signature: with information like my signature as this helps the helpers offer pertinent advice.

Are you saying XP Windows Defender is unnecessary with the behavior shield active
or WD is unnecessary in general ?

I’m saying Windows Defender is not needed on XP.

On Windows Vista or Windows 7 it is OK but should be kept up to date through its portal:
Latest definition version: 1.95.885.0
http://www.microsoft.com/security/portal/Definitions/ADL.aspx

Be sure you use the correct 32-bit or 64-bit definitions.

I’ve been using WD in XP for 3 years.
Can you tell me what you base your opinion that is not necessary ??

2 years ago I picked up a drive-by virus and WD came to the rescue. See this:
http://forum.avast.com/index.php?topic=40658.msg340837#msg340837

2 years ago avast! V5 was not available and when V5 became available I removed WD from my XP Pro system and have not looked back.

I bet that DavidR does not use WD on his system neither.

Hey, I don’t want to get in a war on this. All I was trying to ask was whether a “best practice”
(a consensus) had been developed re: this issue. It’s new to me, since I just installed Avast 5
for the first time today.

An alternative might be to disable the behavior shield and keep WD active.

I’m still not clear whether they do the same thing or not.

I don’t use Win Defender on my XP-Home, XP-Pro or Vista since I have Avast 5.0+ (see my Signature on my main machine) because I feel that I am well protected without it, and it uses a lot of memory. But everyone is entitled to have what ever software they feel they want for their system.

+1
My personal opinion is: drop it…! :wink:
asyn

OK - I’ll give it a try. I’ve enabled it and disabled realtime monitoring in WD.