Love Avast, but why does it rank so low?

http://www.av-comparatives.org/seiten/ergebnisse_2006_08.php

Would really like to see Avast detecting more viruses, particularly the polymorphic kind.
2/10 is disappointing. New features are nice, but it doesn’t mean much if viruses are overlooked.

Does anyone know if there are plans to address this low-score virus detection issue?

Many Thanks

Quoted from the site:

“It is forbidden to provide the tables or results in full or in parts on other sites! Please just refer a link to www.av-comparatives.org.”

I think we should respect the author. You are looking at a single line in a table,
and then you will be able to find whatever you are looking for. :frowning:

The conclusion of the test is what counts here. Read the whole test instead of
misusing a single number.

Thanks

Avast is always improving, so i think you can expect even better results in next test of this kind. :wink:

Read Vlk’s posts: http://forum.avast.com/index.php?topic=4979.msg36041#msg36041
http://forum.avast.com/index.php?topic=12175.msg102828#msg102828
Here how independent are some of these tests:
http://forum.avast.com/index.php?topic=14071.0

About Jotti:
http://forum.avast.com/index.php?topic=21304.msg186240#msg186240

Note that these particular viruses are zoo samples which you are unlikely to meet in real.

Thank you igor, Tech and IBK.
The info you posted was very helpful.

So, from a user perspective - how does the Avast’s virus detection rank alongside NAV, AVK etc? Have any of you had a situation where another scanner detected a virus, but Avast did not?

Just FYI, IBK is the owner of the av-comparatives.org site - so he certainly knows what he’s talking about… :wink: :slight_smile:

Sure, such a situation sometimes occurs - with any antivirus, not just avast!.