I believe what Sirmer means that if a sub-domain, like hxxp://pda.angelbolt.in/ is infected and considered malicious; then avast’s Network Shield won’t block the whole domain name hxxp://angelbolt.in/ and all associated sub-domains only those that are considered infected/malicious.

So if the hxxp://pda.angelbolt.in/ sub-domain is considered malicious, you would still get the alert when you try to access it or download that angel%20PDA.exe file.

As for avast and MBAM, neither alert on the “angel PDA.exe” file, though some others do, 5/42 at http://www.virustotal.com/file-scan/report.html?id=fe00e2e12e720f9b2a241f8055d57b28b9edf7e20658ed33c224a49bf29dd33e-1309698864 and they are generic/heuristic detections more prone to FP.

So if you can get this angel PDA.exe file from another source it would probably be OK. However, 5 consider it at least suspicious. That said two are BitDefender and GData and GData has BitDefender as one of its two scanners, also F-Secure has the exact generic signature name (Trojan.Generic.3194054), so I would say there is a chance that to is related to bitdefencers signatures.

That is a s good as I can give you, I can’t say the file is clean or not.