New free firewall!

Hi all,

I have just stumbled across a new firewall that I have never heard of before. It’s called R-Firewall. It is completely freeware.

R-Firewall is an effective and easy-to-use solution to secure your on-line activity. It protects a computer connected to a local network and/or to the Internet against any intrusions, attacks, trojans, spyware, and other external and internal threats. R-Firewall also filters out inappropriate Internet pages content and blocks dangerous active components you may get while browsing over the Internet or receiving e-mail massages.

Automatic configuration during setup allows you securely surf the Internet right after the software installation. Mobile users can create multiple and easily switchable configurations for specific network environments (Internet surfing at home, office local networks, or public Wi-Fi spots).

Network security features
Monitors network activity at the application and system component levels;
Detects and blocks direct network intrusions;
Detects and blocks network connections that malicious programs try to establish from within and outside the protected computer;
Detects and blocks numerous types of attacks;
Detects and blocks various dangerous active content on the Internet, such as JavaScript objects, ActiveX components, etc;
Checks e-mail attachments for dangerous content, such as executable programs, JavaScript objects, ActiveX components, etc;
Converts the protected computer into a “stealth” machine running invisibly to outside intruders;
Provides detailed log information

Content control features
Detects and blocks unwanted information on the Internet, such as commercial banners, pop-up windows, and cookies;
Blocks access to undesirable or inappropriate Web pages, specified either directly by their URLs, or by keywords;

Easy-to-use features
Automatic configuration during setup. Your computer is ready for surfing the Internet right after the installation;
Presets for most Internet applications. No need to manually set ports, protocols, or other technical staff for each installed program;
Multiple and easily switchable configurations that you can create for a specific network environment (for your home, for your office local network, or
for a public Wi-Fi spot);
Two types of interfaces: Simple for inexperienced users and Advanced for fine-tuning;
An indefinite number of rules for each application;
Low resource requirements

I am in the process of testing it out.

It can be found here: http://www.r-firewall.com

xistenz,

Looks interesting, using ZONE ALARM now.

Will be interested in your review.

My Inital Impressions of R-Firewall

I was looking forward to seeing how this new firewall would work, and on first impressions, it was a little dissapointing.

Firstly, it tries too hard to be like Agnitum’s Outpost firewall. It has similar “Policies” (Allow All/Allow/Ask/Block/Block All) and it has has an ad blocker that operates in a similar fashion to Outpost’s.

When it is first run, a wizard starts allowing you to get started quickly.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v651/xistenz/wizard1.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v651/xistenz/wizard2.jpg

Then the simple view is presented to you.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v651/xistenz/simple.jpg

With the option of changing to an advanced view.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v651/xistenz/Advanced.jpg

The firewall is quite effiective at blocking ads.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v651/xistenz/adblocker.jpg

Whenever a program tries to access the internet on “Ask” mode, you are presented with the following box. I couldn’t quite work out what to select to “remember” the application like ZoneAlarm would do. Not for the un-initiated then…

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v651/xistenz/allowdeny.jpg

The most irratating aspect about the firewall is the Component control thing. It bugs you every time it detects a change in an application and is quite annoying (to put it mildly)

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v651/xistenz/CRC.jpg

On the plus side, it does work with Microsoft’s Internet Connection Sharing (ICS) without a lengthy configuration process, and it does mimic one of the better commercial firewalls.

However, inbound protection is a bit lagging. On the GRC Shields-up test, it allowed a ping request. The only other firewall that I know of that lets pings go through is the default Windows XP SP2 firewall. I couldn’t do other online firewall tests because my ISP uses a NAT router, so if anyone has done those tests with R-Firewall, please post the results here.

In summary, If you are looking for the features of Outpost Pro, but find Outpost Free too limiting, then R-Firewall is a good compromise. This is one to keep an eye on and we will see how much it has improved in a years time.

When you install it, don’t install the CRC Component Control, its a real pain in the neck.

xistenz - that is one great review, it must have took you quite long time to check all those things. I’m sure this will be very helpful for many people that are looking for some new firewall solution… I’m not sure is this good or bad firewall since I never tested it, but I believe your review reveals some very important points.

So much effort and time, all those nice pictures… wonderful…

Thanks again !
Cheers !

How well does it do at places like SOS Scan and Sheilds Up?

–lee

xistenz
Thanks for the excellent Review. I’m adding a link to your revies to my
http://snipurl.com/dwhh
.
That way it will always be available for easy access.

How much memory does it use? But a really good review 8)

Thanks for the accolades! ;D

I only did the fiewall test at GRC’s Shields-up and it had the same level of inbound protection as the Windows XP firewall.

I only did an initial end-users review. A more indepth one may follow. Watch this space…

A word of warning: Make a restore point before installing it and disable it before uninstalling it. It likes to protect your computer even after its gone. ;D

Hahaha, not quite good sign I would say… ;D

[QUOTE]However, inbound protection is a bit lagging. On the GRC Shields-up test, it allowed a ping request. The only other firewall that I know of that lets pings go through is the default Windows XP SP2 firewall. I couldn’t do other online firewall tests because my ISP uses a NAT router, so if anyone has done those tests with R-Firewall, please post the results here.
[/quote]
It failed the Shields Up test for me, the last time I tested it. It failed to stealth the ports!!!

This is bad… Can you post the port (or ports) number that failed the test?

I have the same testing as well a few weeks ago. Got rid of that firewall once I found out that you can see the port close and not in Stealth. Even though I remove every bit of that pesky Firewall by using my computer search. Windows Security Center still detects that R-Firewall even though I check everybit of my hardrive. Using Windows Firewall from now on.

But this will be even less than ‘closed’ ports :o :o
You’re only being protected from inbound attacks… what about outbound connections from your computer?

Just gonna have only full access on programs that needs updates like Avast! and Spyware blaster also with Instant Messangers. I try alot of firewalls but I rather use Windows Firewall since every other firewall just dosn’t like me. :cry:

MFB
Half protection is like having your mouth half open when the flies are sworming.
You know that some will get in… I’m sure you don’t want your private information
all over the net do you?

Yeah you got a point there, but I try like every firewall from ZoneAlarm to Sygate. They all seem to pummel me in the internet one way or another. For now Windows Firewall is my last resort and I’ll make sure only the most important programs receives full access. Thanks again for the warning flags you guys.

It’s your neck we’re just trying to help you protect it but all we can do is try.
The final decision is always yours.

It was probably all of the ports and definitely a lot of the ports!!!

FYI, I tested it probably back in January.

There’s two other firewalls that did pass the Shields Up test.

Those are NetVeda SafetyNet and SoftPerfect Firewall.

I have been using the Sygate firewall on my laptop and the Zone Alarm on my desktop. Since there is a bug in the Sygate that I didn’t like I thought I would try the R-Firewall out. It appears to have a lot more options for adjusting than the free Zone Alarm, or Sygate.

I next did an uninstall using the R-Firewall uninstaller to see if there were any problems, and there were none, and it was uninstalled except for the program folder with 4 files in it. Some registry keys were left, but thats the way it is with many programs when you uninstall them.

I then reinstall it and used the Windows Add & Remove programs to uninstall it, same results as above. So I don’t know why “xistenz” said

“A word of warning: Make a restore point before installing it and disable it before uninstalling it. It likes to protect your computer even after its gone.”

Memory ussage:
R-Firewall.exe 10,156 kb
RTT-CRC Service.exe 3,136

Hard to tell how it really does for a scan at Shields up or Sygate, because I’m behind a firewall with my wireless router on my laptop. I think it would pass with the right settings, I would have to use a friends dialup PC next door for a test later this week. It did pass some of the leak test.

Right now I playing with the SafetyNet Firewall and so far I really like it. It passed some of the leak test and failed some, but it’s still not configured totally either.

If you want to test your Firewall for leaks try this site. Read the FAQ first.
Firewall Leak Testing
http://www.firewallleaktester.com/tests.htm

No Firewall will give you total protection!