The Panda used in the test is not latest either…Have to admit, it does perform good
panda have done lots of Work with this cloud tecnology and Seems to got it to work…and they where the first one to use it
OBS: panda is still selling the standard signature based AV…that have cloud as and extra help
So i guess they dont trust it 100% yet ?
Why all the fuss about some tests ? We old geeks who have used one AV or other for the past 15 or more years know that the top 5 10 AV will give you the protection you need. Now what you want is something else entirely different and that is why I chose to stay with Avast!. It is what I want. Avast! is light, Avast! IMHO has the best protection browsing the web. Avast! has less F/P. Its UI has been improved beautifully and It has the best Forum for any troubleshooting inimaginable.
39.93!!! thats hoorrible any way… lol
I still like avast! … Ok lemme rephrase this Panda has improved ALOT… and nod32 is better… in 0 day But it is still worse in everything else…
Thank you Jadinolf. I think your pirate has been the best so far you old gizz… I know it is not the Avast! female voice because she is Penelope Cruz. I wonder who is she ?. Time a go the Avast! English version had this intimidating male voice so I used to have my Avast! in Spanish just to here her sweet voice saying " Avast! Virus data base has been updated " ;D
seems like avast has to strengthen their heursitics and GET WORKING TWEAKING ON THE BEHAVIOUR SHIELD… its probably one of the most ignored components yet
Agreed, I tried Panda Cloud on my 3 systems here and the lag when trying to browse the net was truly dreadful, of all the AV’s I have tried Panda has been the worst in terms of detrimental affects to a system. I have yet to meet anyone that has actually kept Panda Cloud running for more than 2 days.