Hi DavidR,

That is why I suggested that as first option. Besides I would not doubt both users in the thread as to their good intentions, else there was not a possibility they could be members of this forum, because there should be no room left here for malintent.
Whenever I scan and analyse a website it is just to aid the victim in pointing out the (potential) malcode found and also alert to software weaknesses and vulnerabilities to be tackled.
To just show this with an example. It is for instance vital to know for webmasters that they could better run PHP as cgi for certain configurations on linux as PHP is weak and vulnerable in design and is the royal hackroute into website server software… This knowledge is vital in nature and therefore I do not believe in security through obscurity - it does not last long anyway. It all comes with the intention - as a hammer can be used either to ruin or sculpt something beautiful… same is wiyh code versus malcode…

polonus

P.S.
@DavidR → From what you tell us here, we urgently need an anti-phishing shield in the avast solution. This could be the start of such a new feature!

Damian