https://selabs.uk/download/consumers/epp/2019/jan-mar-2019-home.pdf
https://malwaretips.com/attachments/firefox_vzytbradla-png.214615/
https://selabs.uk/download/consumers/epp/2019/jan-mar-2019-home.pdf
https://malwaretips.com/attachments/firefox_vzytbradla-png.214615/
What does this have to do with Avast ??? Or, how does this help Avast users ???
Exactly the same as posting results from av-comparatives.org or av-test.org
Thanks.
What does this have to do with Avast ??? Or, how does this help Avast users ???
Avast’s 92%
AVG’s 87%
While both use same virus database…:unsure:
bob3160 post:2:What does this have to do with Avast ??? Or, how does this help Avast users ???
Avast’s 92%
AVG’s 87%
While both use same virus database…:unsure:
Maybe that inconsistency needs to pointed out to the testing lab ???
Be Secure post:5: bob3160 post:2:What does this have to do with Avast ??? Or, how does this help Avast users ???
Avast’s 92%
AVG’s 87%
While both use same virus database…:unsure:Maybe that inconsistency needs to pointed out to the testing lab ???
hmm
Hello,
we are in touch with SE Labs
Milos
Be Secure post:5: bob3160 post:2:What does this have to do with Avast ??? Or, how does this help Avast users ???
Avast’s 92%
AVG’s 87%
While both use same virus database…:unsure:Maybe that inconsistency needs to pointed out to the testing lab ???
There have been cases where such tests pointed out a bug in avast! or AVG that created such inconsistencies. So, it can’t always be blamed on the tests itself.