system
1
why avast that low and macafe that high O.o
https://threatcenter.crdf.fr/?Stats
Milos
2
Hello,
look on the numbers. The shortest bar on the first image starts on about 48 % and on second one the longest ends on about 48 % in this way it is distorted in my opinion 
Milos
Which is the independence of that site?
Does it belong to McAfee? Receive money for testing?
CraigB
4
Looks a bit dodgy to me, test is only 792 samples plus what is superantispyware doing in the list ??? its not an av and i thought PCTools wasn’t being developed anymore or at least Symantec have let it go stale.
system
5
Statistics on the detection rate for each antiviral products
This test is updated every day at two o’clock in the morning on a sample of about 1000 threats (see details for the exact figure). This test is based on the recognition of new threats with antivirus, why we call zero-day detection.
CraigB
6
Yes we can read the link but it doesn’t really answer our questions.
Have to get Polonus to test out there sample submission page https://threatcenter.crdf.fr/?SampleSendClient
CraigB
7
There partners are mentioned here Tech https://threatcenter.crdf.fr/?Partners
Donovan
8
What’s wrong with Firefox?
http://i795.photobucket.com/albums/yy238/Donovansrb10/trolololol.png
1 - 2 - 3
Just because there’s a “s” after “http” and the certificate is not verified. :-\
But relating to the topic…
Microsoft beat avast! by 2 threats. :‘(
I don’t trust today’s results. >:(
You just wait till’ tomorrow. That’s when the fun begins. 
nmb
10
About the picture…
Yes, it should be on a 100 percent scale.