I was running an updated avast 5 free
i got a flash from a friend and when i inserted avast said it detected a win32/sality.NAR virus
just said DETECTED i thought it removed it.after 10 minutes my system restart and restart
I uninstall the program
use avira Rescue System(boot scan)and found 68 virus in drive d and 37 in other drives
Detected but did not PROCTECT my system
my sister’s system also ruined getting a DAONOL Trojan while using an updated avast free
i will NEVER use this nice-looking but FAKE antivirus
NOD32 And AVIRA are far better
sorry,but please think more about using this product
thanks for reading
instead of blaming avast you should learn something more about file infectors like sality,also dont watch porn 8) or what ever you download,rly dunno,you can use nod32,at friday i tested nod32 vs avast,avast detected 3 trojan bankers on my friends pc and eset detected 0,go on my friend,go on
nothing is perfect
i do agree
but porn…did you read?
i got that from a flash usb
61 viruses?impossible.however you told that you had trojans on another pc
Sality is a nasty one…
Sality Virus
http://antivirus.about.com/od/virusdescriptions/p/sality.htm
http://www.google.no/search?hl=no&q=Sality&btnG=Søk&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=
You can try to clean with these
Dr.Web CureIt http://www.freedrweb.com/cureit/?lng=en
How Do I Use Dr.Web CureIt!? http://www.freedrweb.com/cureit/how_it_works/
Norman Malware Cleaner http://www.norman.com/support/support_tools/58732/en-us
But i think you will need expert help from Essexboy to clean this…
far better http://free.avg.com/us-en/win32-sality
also check this vid how to clean a patching virus http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FGDl-IMOt1g
all of them was the copy of sality in system voule information and d:\windows and …
that trojan(daonol)was in my sisters system 6 months ago and made her reinstall the window
avast didnt catch it
avira could not be installed
nod32 did install and removed it but the windows was not the thing it shoud be so the windows was reinstalled
i know no antivirus is perfect especially aganst new and unkown malwares,but the program should at least protect systems from well-known threats
all of you know SALITY,if your system is not secure agains this very known malware then do you really feel protected and FEEL FREE!!!
you’ve gotta be kidding. Avira pops up with a suggestion to upgrade to the Pro version on every db update. NOD… well, one day it told me that last upgrade was in year 1970, then it also has other bugs. Avast! is far better than NOD at detecting stuffs, Avira has good detection rates (but, uhm, false positives too), but is annoying as heck. So, choose yourself 
Also, no antivirus can detect/heal everything, so if Avast! fails, doesn’t mean it’s fake. If virus damaged system files, your system WILL likely reboot and stuff.
far better http://free.avg.com/us-en/win32-salitymay be better with the Sality yes......but if Sality have invited 60 friends to the party! i guess it will not clean those as it is a specialised Sality cleaner but you should absolutely run it
I still think this is a jobb for Essexboy…
for essexboy,yes
+1
He is a Certified Malware Removal Expert. Given that you have so much malware, I would have him deal with your problems.
thanks friends
i have solved my problems using avira rescue cd
now i m using nod 32 4.2.64.12
it s smooth and light
i just wanna warn you about your exposure to nasty malwares
good luck
bye
If sality comes down as one of the known variants then Avast will stop it. If the payload file is a new variant, Avast may not detect it but it will pick up on the infector at work, and should block it. But it is beholden upon you to be cautious - if you are offered a USB with good programmes on it, scan it first with both Avast and MBAM, that should stop the great majority of nasty surprises
I have just cleaned two systems from one location with Virut. The one protected by Avast stopped the infection from spreading, all I had to do was locate and remove the trigger, job done. The other system was using Norton and we had to reformat as it was too far gone, ove 400 files corrupted. So draw your own conclusions from that
Hello but avast is an Anti virus little encouraging face has Avira and nod32 but me the prefer has kapersky
I am held has arrangement to argue if need be
Cordially
i can send the sample file to your email if you want
but the outcome is terrible if you re using avast
just send me your email
as i said avast will detect it
but cant stop it from spreadin
i wave sent a sample to them
I do not want to provoke but to have a dialogue my purpose is not to speak ill but to advance the protections
Here is a server bifrost (This is a work of beginner one does not need more to make also with kapersky)
File Info
Report date: 2010-10-16 20:41:46 (GMT 1)
File name: server-ok-exe
File size: xxxxx bytes (=2mo)
MD5 Hash: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
SHA1 Hash: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Detection rate: 9 on 16 (56%)
Status: INFECTED
Detections
a-squared - AdWare.Dropper.Ardamax!IK
Avast -
AVG - BackDoor.Bifrose.BN
Avira AntiVir - TR/Crypt.TPM.Gen
BitDefender - Gen:Trojan.Heur.bsY@50yQrQm
ClamAV -
Comodo - Backdoor.Win32.Agent.CEP_svr1
Dr.Web -
F-PROT6 - W32/xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Ikarus T3 - AdWare.Dropper.Ardamax
Kaspersky - HEUR:Backdoor.Win32.Generic
NOD32 - Win32/xxxxxxx potentially unwanted
Panda -
TrendMicro -
VBA32 -
VirusBuster -
Scan report generated by
NoVirusThanks.org
What you say is a small provocation ! This is sad…
File Info
Report date: 2010-05-29 22:49:27 (GMT 1)
File name: server.exe
File size: 6199054 bytes
MD5 Hash: 9ea1250cd0a4c635c88bf080b1daa21b
SHA1 Hash: 28be2ef6961f569defad4c54bf0a53124598a7ee
Detection rate: 6 on 19 (32%)
Status: INFECTED
Detections
a-squared - AdWare.Dropper.Ardamax!IK
Avast - -
AVG - -
Avira AntiVir - TR/Crypt.TPM.Gen
BitDefender - Gen:Trojan.Heur.GZ.@tZ@b0U169bi
ClamAV - -
Comodo - -
Dr.Web - -
F-PROT6 - W32/xxxx!Eldorado
G-Data - -
Ikarus T3 - AdWare.Dropper.Ardamax
Kaspersky - -
NOD32 - Win32/xxxxxxx potentially unwanted
Panda - -
Solo - -
TrendMicro - -
VBA32 - -
VirusBuster - -
Zoner - -
Scan report generated by
NoVirusThanks.org
Netcat is not seen in its version origin but cryptcat he is it or is the difference between both
You have gaps do not make the ostrich
i hope everyone got the point
as everyone knows protection is much more important than detection rate
on my case avast detected it,but was unable to secure my system
i checked the infected flash usb with nod32 and showed two samples of of win32/Sality NAR
an autorun.inf and the other name was filmnet.exe
avast detected filmnet.exe but the other varient was WELCOMED in my system
on my sisters case avast didnt even find DAONOL B while being updated and when the sysytem was infected no otherantivirus could be installed exept nod32
i think they have long long way to go to make people FEEL FREE
Bye