If you couldn’t answer my question you should have said so… well, from what I’ve seen on this forum (I do read, you know) I can not say I am surprised - this isn’t personal, I am generalising.

Less resource intensive? Not on any system I ever installed it on (I installed Avast on most of my families systems too, they don’t live in the same household so I am not violating the license.) - good for older systems? Tell that to my Pentium II system, that’s go to run ClamWin now because you don’t support 98 anymore, at least give me 4.8 for that system, I don’t care about lack of support too much, I’m an ICT Practitioner so I know what I am doing - and a friend of mine is CCNP qualified through Cisco - so you won’t get anything past me, On the P2 at least, 4.8 has got to be better than nothing… But that’s not the purpose of my thread and I have nearly derailed it with that.

I know 5/6 won’t install on Windows Server, that is apparent with the much mistaken installer that thinks I am using Windows Server, also, I once did try to install under 2003 to see what would happen, incidentally it caused a BSOD the first time, but after extracting the files manually and hoodwinking the installer into thinking I was running Windows 2000 it did not protest, I cancelled the install, as that system was running OK on ClamWin - it’s a home server, I am not running a company off of it… Avast should consider users of home servers.

I tried to hoodwink the installer the same way on this system a few times, but it did not work. Internet Explorer is Version 6, I am not updating that, you don’t list it in the requirements anyway, might want to change that - what else do I need? I didn’t know Avast were into Shovelware as well now. I wonder how long it is before you start making me install useless toolbars and such too?

As for the UI, in 5/6 it’s completely useless in my opinion. Either way, I can’t say I am impressed.