Why use a standalone spyware program if Avast has built-in spyware protection?

Windows Defender was previously called Windows Anti Spyware and was purchased from Giant by Microsoft
Giant Anti Spyware was great in its day
Sunbelt- Counterspy had a license for Giant and shared R&D with MS for a year
Counterspy is now on its own and doing quite well
the amount of R&D MS is putting into Windows Defender is unknown
(I would not rely on it as my only on demand scanner)

anybody see any tests on scan effectiveness?

If Windows Defender’s real time capabilities have been retained they worked well when was Giant
so worth a try vs Spybot T-Timer and whatever Spyware Terminator has to offer- or Spyware Doctor
I need to check these out or find where some one has

The discussion of Threat Fire, System Safety Monitor, Sandboxie also has to be done

What can we discuss about SandboxIE? Plain and simple: It rules! Lol

I have been using it for about 6 months and have tested over 150 malware with it, nth ever got out. The only negative about SandboxIE, is that I have become a happy clicker.
I clcik on anything just for the fun of it, cause I knows there will be no bad consequences :slight_smile:

Let’s talk a little more about BO Clean

Main thrust of the program is anti-trojan
it has a blacklist that it compares to programs that try to run
very effective against programs in its database
it may duplicate what is in the later AV’s with spyware protection

so my statement as it scanning like Win Patrol may be inaccurate or BO clean may also have a registry scanner (for unauthorized changes)
more investigation needed

BOClean is one of the few programs whose updates are shown at spywarewarrior- updates
not a recommendation but definitely not on a not recommended list

also note that Defense Wall HIPs final is released
http://www.spywarewarrior.com/viewtopic.php?t=25717

BOClean does a very simple and effective thing. For a malware to run and do any damage it has to be loaded in memory first!
As soon as it loads in memory BOClean interacts and snaps its neck!
So the malware hasn’t got a chance to run.

This detection is signature based, so for a malware to be caught it has to be in BOClean’s database, but it’s a very good database in my opinion.
The only thing that bothers me about BOClean, is the fact that it could be lighter on system resources, not that it’s a resource hog, but could be lighter!