Bifrose detection or not? Detected by avast! as JS:ScriptIP-inf [Trj]

Viruses and worms
1

See: https://www.virustotal.com/nl/file/b5293f5625fe07dc9448889a3fac44e8c93b67b558e76d0c860a6e1800dc0073/analysis/
and https://www.virustotal.com/nl/domain/clkbid.com/information/
Re these search query results (hash) https://www.google.nl/search?q=b5293f5625fe07dc9448889a3fac44e8c93b67b558e76d0c860a6e1800dc0073&oq=b5293f5625fe07dc9448889a3fac44e8c93b67b558e76d0c860a6e1800dc0073&aqs=chrome..69i57&sourceid=chrome&espv=210&es_sm=93&ie=UTF-8
The only active one is being detected by avast! as JS:ScriptIP-inf [Trj]: https://www.virustotal.com/nl/file/8b109025197009a056b426961ca8bc555bbbafe47a8da2cad00ca5a679c83333/analysis/

pol

2

yep. confirmed . Superantispyware got the bug avast missed. . but I usually use a combo of superantispyware, malwarebytes and avast for that stuff… it helps. sas is free for use . but to you avast programmers… you’re missing one… its not a good one either. it hogs resources and allows back door intrusions. might want to research that a bit more maybe? until then fellow avast users I’d also recommend both malwarebytes and superantispyware they catch what others miss :slight_smile:

3

Hi Howlsfromshadow,

I am not connected to avast!, just a volunteer into suspicious website scanning “for the good of my soul” and to help avast! detection for our forum community. I too recommend to have avast! resident av combined with SAS and MBAM non-residental anti-malware to have some “additional rear mirrors” added. Also do not forget to have a decent Adblocker in place inside the browser with an additional malware list subscription to be further protected. Almost a must these days. ;D
Thanks for your feedback,

polonus