I’ve had the same issue today on my site (www.ilgrandeinverno.it). In particular a page users continuously reload/refresh as it’s part of a web roleplay gaming interface.
Here are the reports from various online url safety checkers:
Google: https://transparencyreport.google.com/safe-browsing/search?url=http:%2F%2Fwww.ilgrandeinverno.it%2Fgioco%2Fsx_location.php
WebInspector: https://app.webinspector.com/public/reports/88558442
Quttera.com: https://quttera.com/detailed_report/www.ilgrandeinverno.it
Pcrisk.com: https://scanner.pcrisk.com/detailed_report/www.ilgrandeinverno.it#details
Virustotal: https://www.virustotal.com/it/url/8827af9b0d03381f0ce053661e23ac9edac92c8a305cf3eb556c8545c2c468d1/analysis/1540237890/
Securi.Net: https://sitecheck.sucuri.net/results/www.ilgrandeinverno.it/gioco/sx_location.php
Rescan Pro: https://rescan.pro/result.php?cd1696266cf1cf832f7c52e7ffbbd577
All of them mark our domain as clean, and either the two checking directly the supposed-to-be-infected page haven’t found anything of suspect/malicious.
Our site is an amatorial, free web community of roleplayers. No “freemium” rules, no gadgets, no ad campaign, neither a stupid “buy me a coffee” web button.
We’re completely non commercial.
The incriminated page just contains a call to a google fonts content and the google analytics scripts, a selfmade javascript to control the page tools (pm, chat, meteo info, game locations, accessing the playing character’s sheet and so on), and a flash .swf calling some *.mp3 sfx in case of certain game events. And it refreshes automatically about every 120-180 seconds. Period.
Now, the question is: according to the workflow explained here, what the hell of “manual analysis” do you perform in your beloved Avast Threat Labs, before deciding to mark a reported link as phishing?
Players are strange. What I figure out is that some “competitor” players had decided to have fun sending you massive false phishing reports.
Really it’s the only reason I can figure out HOW the hell an inner page of a web gaming interface could have been listed as malicious/phishing (a banking one?? on a RP community??)
Mayhaps I’d have some thoughts about the way you accept anonymous (sorry “confidentially”) reports, withouth either a registration or an email confirm request; even a small wolfpack of idiots can easely send you massive false reports against the targeted site, easely changing their IP addresses using proxies and just inventing each time a new (formally valid, but useless because you don’t either verify it) email address to provide in the report form.
This is not “protecting users from treats”, this is giving idiots the weapons to harm and bother other users.
This time we solved the issue reporting you the false positive, suggesting our users to update Avast to last engine and virus defs and, finally, to mark our domain as trustworthy.
Next time, maybe, we’ll just suggest them to change their antivirus.
PS: Please change the captcha settings, it’s really crappy and I’m for sure not blind. I had to reload the image 8 times before reading the required letters :o