Gen (NASDAQ: GEN) is a global company dedicated to powering Digital Freedom through its trusted Cyber Safety brands, Norton, Avast, LifeLock, Avira, AVG, ReputationDefender and CCleaner. There’s a new generation, and it’s not Gen X, Y, or Z. It’s Gen D: Generation Digital. Our family of consumer brands is rooted in providing safety for the first digital generations. Now, Gen empowers people to live their digital lives safely, privately, and confidently today and for generations to come. We bring award-winning products and services in cybersecurity, online privacy and identity protection to more than 500 million users in more than 150 countries. Gen has dual headquarters in Tempe, Arizona (USA) and Prague, Czech Republic.
I think it was an extraordenary deal and it will still need a lot of time to get everything put at the right place. We all should wait and see, what the future will show us. Feelings are displaced here.
=Snake=
Get Excited Now
I think it’s a perfect name and expression of all the possibilities that exist
when you combine the talents of so many companies to create a fantastic product
that will secure millions of digital lives.
So, Get Excited Now
Did you notice the following? My correction of my last post here, the links: https://www.avast.com/about#pc and https://newsroom.digital.com ?
From the last one, I made a screenshot of the last part. It declares s.th. but, I guess, we all think what to do with all the questions of the new members, for we are missing some guys (e.g. Asyn).
How about declaration concerning the new members?
Greetings from =Snake=
Well, are you angry at me? What I meant was:
1: If you saw my correction concerning MDL.
2: The exclamation mark has nothing to do with the second link and I wrote, that I made a screenshot of the last part of ‘newsroom’. Is that s.th. you can offer to the new members? I think, only a few members of us really know, what happened to Avast and that the momentarily support of this forum has not the quality of the time before NLL caught Avast! So, what way of declaration is the best?
=Snake=
The dates are essentially the same as when I took the screenshot it was correctly reported as yesterday. When you posted the date would have been Yesterday the same as my reply was “« Reply #11 on: Yesterday at 16:11:59 »”
That however is irrelevant as the post 26 Dec 2022 or Yesterday post dates the original post, so how could Bob have seen it when he posted on « Reply #5 on: 23 November 2022, 13:23:35 »
Bob hadn’t responded to your post as he wouldn’t have seen your clarification in « Reply #10 on: Yesterday at 15:00:11 »
That is the problem of making corrections/edits retrospectively after other posts have been made, those people won’t have seen the clarification only what was there first.
So now I’m confused, like Bob and possibly yourself.
