(these malwares have been included in virus def,so the link is removed)
I scanned this file from context menu and avast showed no threat detected
But when i added it to virus chest and scanned it again , virus was found ,see the first screenshot.
No updating during this test…
here’s my context menu scanning settings ,the second screenshot
these are new variants of Renos family that avast dosen’t recognize, try to add them to virus chest and scan them and you will see something interesting …
i came here providing this message ,not for submitting samples but tell you that malwares unrecognized by avast might be detected when scanned in the virus chest
Why should we try something when you are using a crack file.
I have no pity whatsoever for when malware has been included in virus definitions.
There is no such thing as a ‘normal’ crack, aside from any legal, moral issues they are high risk. Who are the people who use these cracks complain to should they get infected ???
@DavidR
I guess you may misunderstand the meaning of the post starter.
Without doubt, this is a malware.
But, this malware could only be detected when it was added to the virus chest and scanned. However, if it was scanned from Windows Explorer, AVAST could not find anything.
Have I made it clear now?
Described as anthony , these are malwares and i complained nothing.
i just found a strange thing that before these malwares were included in virus definitions they had been detected when scanned through virus chest. When we add samples to virus chest they can be scanned right? see the screenshot
AND i repeat , this is not a CRACK, it is a virus… you judge a file by its name? lol…
I think there is some misunderstanding/language problem here…what he is asking is in post 1 and 2
I scanned this file from context menu and avast showed no threat detected
But when i added it to virus chest and scanned it again , virus was found ,see the first screenshot.
it quite confused me whether it's different between scanning from context menu and from virus chest?