Panda outperforms avast!!

I know its avast 6 but you have to admit panda was bas in the beginning and now its amazing…

As your obviously talking about old results that you haven’t even supplied a link too there pretty much meaningless ::slight_smile:

The latest comprehensive tests show, in all instances of;

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0f/Grosser_Panda.JPG/250px-Grosser_Panda.JPG

VS.

http://i27.photobucket.com/albums/c195/wind_bunny/pirate.jpg

pirate wins, every time, don’t know where you are getting your info from.

;D ;D

stupid Panda outperforms world’s best free antivirus avast! ? maybe in your dreams. Avast! has better detection, more functions, more shields, and so on…
EDIT: And a pirate!!!

Hmm, on Panda’s forum they show…

http://cdn0.sbnation.com/entry_photo_images/3101376/angry-panda_large.jpg

VS.

http://profile.ak.fbcdn.net/hprofile-ak-snc4/27533_10150153555760451_3860_n.jpg

(Not so sure [b]that[/b] pirate would win against [b]that[/b] panda!)

http://www.allbestwallpapers.com/tagwallpaper/Kung%20Fu%20Panda-wallpaper.jpg

VS.

http://printables.kaboose.com/img/Pirate_rdax_65.jpg

That is not a pirate, that is clearly an escapee from an “assisted living center”.

No matter how hard you try, you will not find a scary panda. Only thing scary about a panda is getting sat on.

So be careful what antivirus you use. You could let Avast! pillage your infections…or your AV could sit around snacking on bamboo relentlessly. Your choice.

@Danny…posting images needlessly here is already out-of-bounds (yeah, I know I started it), but if you must imitate my bad behavior, try to keep the movie-poster sized pics under control. :wink:

You have no facts… And Panda is a bad joke… All you have to do with malware is to disable internet connection and you finished with your PC…

Avast detection rate: 39.93 for zero day

Panda detection rate: 29.86 for zero day

https://threatcenter.crdf.fr/?Stats

Bob, Is that you?? ;D ;D

I’ve thought the same ;D
But I was ashamed to post ;D

I got my daily laugh from this thread. :slight_smile:

;D More pandas and pirates pictures please, please :smiley:

Mark,
how can you mistake this impostor :

http://forum.avast.com/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=97088.0;attach=80859;image

With the real Bob: ;D

http://my.jetscreenshot.com/2701/m_20120412-qffl-13kb.jpg

http://www.av-test.org/en/tests/test-reports/janfeb-2012/
http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/panda-cloud-antivirus-ranks-as-best-performing-free-antivirus-in-recent-av-test-evaluation-145906515.html
http://blog.cloudantivirus.com/

There thats all the stats I need
-_-’

http://i795.photobucket.com/albums/yy238/Donovansrb10/OBJECTION.jpg

They are comparing it to avast! 6. Furthermore, the results are from January. As far as I can tell, it’s April now and avast! 7 has been released.

I dont know Bob! after several of those long flights you’ve been doing and and the hard case after parties your attending with those computer folk ??? ;D

Another pirate

As already mentioned your stat’s are outdated but if you believe Panda to be so much better then no body is stopping you from using it, personally my testing of Panda lasted about 4 hours before my system slowed to a crawl and it was removed promptly with a re-image :slight_smile:

Wow, that’s some test:

The institute evaluated the protection, repair, usability and performance impact of 23 home user and eight corporate antivirus products in Windows 7 in January and February 2012